Tue Nov 28 02:31:18 1995
From majordom Tue Nov 28 02:31:18 1995
Return-Path:
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
id AA21318; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 02:31:18 +0500
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 02:28:52 -0500
From: Timster132@aol.com
Message-Id: <951128022849_36369433@mail06.mail.aol.com>
To: TC-LIST@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Cc: kloha@sauron.multiverse.com
Subject: James/Text und Textwert
Content-Length: 1636
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
On Tue, 21 Nov 1995, Jeff Kloha wrote:
>
> I am beginning work on a STM thesis on the text of James. Fresh
> collations are being made of the papyri and available uncials.
> However, I need a selection of representative minuscules to consult.
> The first volumes of the _Text und Textwert_ series analyze the
> Catholic Epistles. My question is: While the volumes present
> exhaustive studies of relationships among manuscripts in the "test
> passages", has any work been published using this data to determine
> exactly which manuscripts fall into special groupings?
For a small book such as James, I can understand your reticence on relying
on profile methods to determine text type. I'd suggest examining a textual
apparatus or two of James and make a note of how the miniscule mss fall in
line.
I am sure you will want to consider 33 and 81.
>Have the Alands or their Institut produced any classifications of
manuscripts,
>or have they simply supplied the data and left individuals to use their own
> theories to group manuscripts (e.g., Colwell's multiple readings or
> the Profile Method)?
There is a list of catagories in the Alands' _The Text of the New
Testament_, pp 156-159, 1987 ed.
I picked out *some* in the Alands list that I noticed are textual
witnesses in James. (Look at their book for more info):
Catagory I (Alex): 33, 1241, 1739
Catagory II/mixed: 81, 323
Catagory III/independent: 88, 398 (cath), 623, 2495
Catagory IV/Beza: none
Catagory V: 'M' in text apparatus
I hope this gets you started or is what you were looking for.
Tim Staker
Timster132@aol.com
Back