Sat Dec 2 02:07:13 1995

From majordom  Sat Dec  2 02:07:13 1995
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA04949; Sat, 2 Dec 1995 02:07:13 +0500
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 1995 02:04:56 -0500
From: Timster132@aol.com
Message-Id: <951202020454_41527257@emout05.mail.aol.com>
To: Mark_O'Brien@dts.edu, TC-LIST@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Collation against MT vs. TR
Content-Length: 406
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk

In a message dated 95-12-01 10:36:23 EST, Mark_O'Brien@dts.edu (Mark O'Brien)
writes:

>After Dan Wallace published his article advocating the use of the MT as
>the best collating base,

  At first I thought MT meant Masoretic Text, since we've been discussing
various names for Scriptures.  Boy was I confused!  Evidently you were
talking about the NT Majority Text (?)

  Tim Staker
  Timster132@aol.com

Back