Mon Dec 4 11:39:07 1995
From majordom Mon Dec 4 11:39:07 1995
Return-Path:
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
id AA09080; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 11:39:07 +0500
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 11:35:09 -0500 (EST)
From: David Moore
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Supercessionism
To: Timster132@aol.com
Cc: TC-LIST@scholar.cc.emory.edu
In-Reply-To: <951204032443_43593291@mail02.mail.aol.com>
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1539
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
On Mon, 4 Dec 1995 Timster132@aol.com wrote:
>
> That's kind of like the American traveler that goes abroad and expects
> everyone in the world to speak English and is put off because they do not.
> Actually, foreign folks usually feel very complimented when you use their
> language, even if you speak it badly.
>
> I am not advocating persuing the myth you are talking about. I am not
> talking about trying to please everyone and never offend anyone, which is
> pollyanna.
>
> I think what my suggestion is that we can do this to show *mutual repect".
Mutual respect is fine; I'm all for it. But may I suggest that
mutual respect is more readily recognizable when it is expressed freely
than when it is adhered to because it is prescribed.
We're not talking about speaking languages not understood by one
another. Take for example a couple of titles that have to do with the
list topic: Wu:rthwein calls his book _The Text of the Old Testament_
whereas P. Kyle McCarter, Jr. has written _Textual Criticism: Recovering
the Text of the Hebrew Bible_. Either of these titles is equally
understandable; so why the fuss?
I think it is probable that the majority of those on the list
would like, as I would, to save the bandwidth we're using on this debate
for matters that are more on topic.
David L. Moore Southeastern Spanish District
Miami, Florida of the Assemblies of God
dvdmoore@dcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us Department of Education
Back