Fri Dec 1 10:33:12 1995

From majordom  Fri Dec  1 10:33:12 1995
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA02832; Fri, 1 Dec 1995 10:33:12 +0500
Message-Id: <00000ED5.sm@dts.edu>
Subject: Collation against MT vs. TR
Date: Fri,  1 Dec 95 09:19:13 CST
From: Mark_O'Brien@dts.edu (Mark O'Brien)
To: TC-LIST@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Organization: Dallas Theological Seminary
X-Hologate: 1.1.7b2
Lines: 251
Content-Length: 686
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk


After Dan Wallace published his article advocating the use of the MT as
the best collating base, I'm curious to know how many of you have 
switched to using the MT in this way, and how many of you have 
stuck to the TR.  I'm more interested in knowing why you have stuck to
the TR as a collating base, especially in the light of Wallace's comments
on the advantages of using the "most inferior text" (as he terms it)
as your collating base, especially for the purposes of quantitative
analysis. 

Regards,

Mark O'Brien
Grad. student, NT
Dallas Theological Seminary
----
"We were put on earth to accomplish a certain number of things.  Right now, I'm
so far behind, I will never die!"

Back