Thu Dec 7 05:24:25 1995

From majordom  Thu Dec  7 05:24:25 1995
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA17405; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 05:24:25 +0500
Message-Id: 
To: TC-LIST@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: DC PARKER 
Organization: Fac of Arts:The Univ. of Birmingham
Date:         Thu, 7 Dec 1995 09:54:20 GMT
Subject:      Collation against MT vs. TR
X-Pmrqc:      1
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     WinPMail v1.0 (R2)
Content-Length: 460
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk

The original query from Mark O'Brien (1 Dec.) concerned why one 
should stick to using the TR.  For a justification of the IGNTP 
approach, see my 'The IGNTP: the Gospel of John', NTS 36 (1990), 
157-160, p. 159.

I would also like to emphasize that collation is a convenient means of 
recording data, but NOT a tool for analysing it.
DC PARKER
DEPT OF THEOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM
TEL. 0121-414 3613
FAX  0121-414 6866
E-MAIL PARKERDC@M4-ARTS.BHAM.AC.UK

Back