Sun Feb 11 15:23:19 1996

From majordom  Sun Feb 11 15:23:19 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA02468; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 15:23:19 +0500
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 96 15:20:33 EST
From: Richard Weis 
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Suffixes at Qumran
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 11 Feb 1996 14:54:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: 
Content-Length: 312
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

11 February, 1996,

Andrew Gross's observation that Qimron's monograph focuses on non-Biblical
texts at Qumran is exactly why the work is valuable for text criticism.  It
describes the Hebrew of the Qumran scribes, the Hebrew according to which
they might "modernize" BH forms as they copied them.

Richard Weis

Back