Tue Mar 26 16:33:54 1996

From majordom  Tue Mar 26 16:33:54 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA29888; Tue, 26 Mar 1996 16:33:54 +0500
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 16:31:01 -0500
From: HuldrychZ@aol.com
Message-Id: <960326163100_455437122@mail02.mail.aol.com>
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: James
Content-Length: 298
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

So, sans "grin", why the apparent hostility to the idea that  James was
originally written in Aramaic?  The supposed Aramaic Matthew is making some
progress, isn't it?

Kittel dated James very early, didn't he?  The language of the epistle in the
canon is not specifically Greek, is it?


Jim West

Back