Mon Mar 4 16:24:54 1996

From majordom  Mon Mar  4 16:24:54 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA04103; Mon, 4 Mar 1996 16:24:54 +0500
From: dwashbur@nyx.net (David Washburn)
Message-Id: <9603042122.AA09707@nyx.net>
Subject: Re: Gen 22
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 14:22:03 -0700 (MST)
In-Reply-To: <960304113116_237204184@emout09.mail.aol.com> from "HuldrychZ@aol.com" at Mar 4, 96 11:31:16 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 541       
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Status: O
X-Status: 

Jim West asked:
> In 4QGen-Exod(a) at Gen 22:14, the text has "Elohim" where BHS has YHWH.  In
> BHS there is no note for this textual variant.  This strikes me as somewhat
> odd.  What criteria were used by BHS to determine inclusion of variants? And
> how could this seemingly significant variant be overlooked?

4QGen-Exod(a) was only published a year or two ago, and hence wasn't 
available to the BHS editors.

-- 
Dave
			http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur/home.html
Seen in a classified ad: "Parachute for sale.  Used once.  Never opened."

Back