Tue Mar 12 01:29:33 1996

From majordom  Tue Mar 12 01:29:33 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA02187; Tue, 12 Mar 1996 01:29:33 +0500
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 22:26:36 -0800
From: MrNyse195@eworld.com
Message-Id: <960311222634_27597354@hp1.online.apple.com>
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Different dating systems
Content-Length: 612
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Status: O
X-Status: 

I don't know if it's relevant to this list, but I'm curious as to what
everyone has to say on this issue-

If papryologists come to a set date on a particular manuscript or set of mss.
(say for example, p52 being around 110-138 A.D.), then how do liberal
scholars come to their own conclusions (example- John being written later
than 100 A.D. by someone other than John) and still consider themselves to be
looking "honestly" at the evidence?

In Christ,
Kerry Gilliard
Director and Founder
W.I.T.N.E.S.S.  Ministries
http://members.aol.com/blufunk195/witness.html

"God has a great sense of humor. He made me."

Back