Wed Mar 13 19:09:47 1996
From majordom Wed Mar 13 19:09:47 1996
Return-Path:
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
id AA10585; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 19:09:47 +0500
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 19:06:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Maurice Robinson
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: James 2:18
In-Reply-To:
Message-Id:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1612
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Status: O
X-Status:
On Wed, 13 Mar 1996, James R. Adair wrote:
> XWRIS means "apart from, without." In the context of the argument, the
> author is challenging his hypothetical opponent to demonstrate his faith
> _without_ works, while he would demonstrate his _by_ his works. So
> while either EK or XWRIS will fit at the phrase level, only XWRIS makes
> sense in the context of the whole argument.
I would question this assertion, since from a rhetorical standpoint (if
the Byztxt is followed) XWRIS has NOT been used before verse 20, though
the use of XWRIS does become a dominant issue in verses 20-26. Up until
that point, the discussion does not center on the issue of faith WITHOUT
or APART FROM works, but differs rhetorically and semantically, i.e., the
topic under discussion in 2:14-19 is "if someone should claim to have
faith, but does not have works" -- this is an entirely different matter,
and does not concern the XWRIS discussion of 2:20-26.
The likelihood of importing XWRIS from its first (Byztxt) appearance in
2:20 to ease the interpretative difficulty in 2:18 a few lines above
still seems to be the best explanation of how other readings all stem
from the Byzantine variant.
=========================================================================
Maurice A. Robinson, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Greek and New Testament
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary
Wake Forest, North Carolina
=========================================================================
Back