Sun Mar 17 01:06:34 1996

From majordom  Sun Mar 17 01:06:34 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA09997; Sun, 17 Mar 1996 01:06:34 +0500
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 1996 01:03:49 -0500
From: MrNyse195@aol.com
Message-Id: <960317010349_247979372@emout04.mail.aol.com>
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Different dating systems
Content-Length: 568
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Status: O
X-Status: 

>>>In fact, there is remarkable agreement among conservatives and
liberals over dating John to c.90-100.   J.A.T.Robinson is the major
exception.<<<

This is true- most of the material I read up on places John around 90-100
C.E. Perhaps my intial comment (after 95) was a bit too hasty-more of an
average I should say....

In any case, back to my original question-what do folks who tend to date
materials late, do in light of parylogical and (in some cases) strong
internal evidence toward the contrary?

Kerry Gilliard
http://member.aol.com/blufunk195/witness.html

Back