Thu Apr 18 17:59:45 1996

From majordom  Thu Apr 18 17:59:45 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA21917; Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:59:45 +0500
Message-Id: <199604182156.RAA34064@r02n08.cac.psu.edu>
X-Sender: wlp1@email.psu.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1996 17:56:47 -0400
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: wlp1@psu.edu (William L. Petersen)
Subject: Re: new leaves of Codex Sinaiticus?
Content-Length: 1227
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

I'm not sure...  A missing folio of Syr-cur has, apparently, been found and
published:  D.L. McConaughy, "A Recently Discovered Folio of the Old Syriac
(Syc) Text of Luke 16,13-17,1," in Biblica 68 (1987), 85-88.  The folio fits
(size, text, paleography, etc.) exactly into a lacuna in Syr-c.  It was
found by McConaughy in the Deir el Suryan monastery in the Wadi el Natrun in
Egypt in November, 1985.

Is this what you're thinking of, or does someone else know of lost folia of
Codex Sinaiticus, as referenced in Jimmy's original post??

Petersen--Penn State University



>Because of the mailing list problems we've been having, I'm re-posting my 
>message from last week.
>
>**************************************************************************
>I seem to recall hearing recently (was it on this list?) that additional 
>leaves of Codex Sinaiticus had been discovered at St. Catherine's 
>monastery in the past few years.  Can anyone verify or deny this?  If 
>true, have they been published?
>
>Jimmy Adair
>Manager of Information Technology Services, Scholars Press
>    and
>Managing Editor of TELA, the Scholars Press World Wide Web Site
>---------------> http://scholar.cc.emory.edu <-----------------
>
>
>
>
>

Back