Fri Apr 26 15:02:17 1996

From majordom  Fri Apr 26 15:02:17 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA27452; Fri, 26 Apr 1996 15:02:17 +0500
From: rachel@ms1.hinet.net
Message-Id: <199604261858.CAA28473@hntp3.hinet.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 96 12:04:12
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: John TR available
In-Reply-To: 
X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition v0.99t 
Content-Length: 1297
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

In , on 04/22/96 at 06:59 PM,
   Bruce   said:
Hello I think that you should check it one more time   ....  ;) If I am
not mistaken Maurice Robinson included his Greek NT and  not Stephanus
1550 right?    My meaning is that both of them  are included but his is
the Byz txt 
There is already too much confusion concerning his text

>On Mon, 22 Apr 1996, Vincent Broman wrote:

>> Seeing the recent discussion on differences between TRs, I tried compari
>> the IGNTP John TR with the OnLine Bible Stephanus 1550 from Robinson.
>> Aside from a large number of movable nu's and sigma's present only in
>> the OLB John, I found seven significant differences between them, one gr
>> These differences should be authoritatively checked in order to ensure
>> the integrity of future (and past) IGNTP collations.

>Other than versification, as discussed previously, the IGNTP John TR is 
>identical to the 1873 TR in each of these 7 "TR variants".

>Bruce Morrill   bruce@math.ksu.edu


--
-----------------------------------------------------------
rachel@ms1.hinet.net
That is my email address
However my name is Jim
Brought to you by S.S.R. 
Back