Wed Apr 3 20:19:18 1996

From majordom  Wed Apr  3 20:19:18 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA19322; Wed, 3 Apr 1996 20:19:18 +0500
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 19:16:20 -0600
Message-Id: <9604040116.AA02603@felix>
X-Sender: crockett@teclink.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: crockett@felix.TECLink.Net (Bennie R. Crockett, Jr.)
Subject: Jn 9.38 Text
Content-Length: 855
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu


In the UBS 4th ed., an alternate reading for Jn 9.38 occurs that is 
not cited in the UBS 1st ed., UBS 3rd ed., UBS 3rd corr. ed., 
N-A, 26th ed., and N-A, 27th ed. [I do not have the UBS 2nd ed. at hand]

Although this eleventh century lectionary reading certainly is secondary,
I am wondering _why_ the UBS editors might have chosen to include this 
variant, especially in light of the fact that it is absent from the 
editions cited above.  Dr. Metzger does not address this issue in his
_Textual Commentary_.

Also, does anyone know if this reading is included in other critical
editions as an alternate reading?  If so, which ones?

================================================================================
Bennie R. Crockett, Jr. 
Professor of Religion and Philosophy
Assoc. VP, Academic Programs
William Carey College
Hattiesburg, MS 
USA

Back