Sat Apr 27 11:37:24 1996

From majordom  Sat Apr 27 11:37:24 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA00261; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 11:37:24 +0500
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 11:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andrew  Gross 
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: RE: Eclectic Method
In-Reply-To: <0754438249304557@maties.sun.ac.za>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 789
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu


On Sat, 27 Apr 1996 cook@maties.sun.ac.za wrote:

> I think OT TC must adjust to NT and for that matter Septuagintal methodology!
> The time is ripe to reconstruct an OT critical text! I argued it in the
> Festschrift for FC Fensham in 1986.
> 
> Johann Cook

Unfortunately, our library has not yet received this volume.  Would you be
so kind as to elucidate this for us?  This sounds like a fruitful line of
discussion because (1) we can get some good discussion about the different
needs and approaches between OT and NT text critical methodology and (2) 
we'll actually be getting some OT text critical talk going here.  (I know 
I shouldn't complain, and that if I'm so curious, I should be starting 
threads myself...)

Anyway, I'd appreciate hearing more about this.


andrew gross

Back