Sat Apr 27 18:56:14 1996
From majordom Sat Apr 27 18:56:14 1996
Return-Path:
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
id AA01707; Sat, 27 Apr 1996 18:56:14 +0500
Message-Id: <199604272155.PAA13009@wave.sheridan.wy.us>
Comments: Authenticated sender is
From: "Dave Washburn"
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:53:13 -7
Subject: Re: Waite just a minute
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Content-Length: 1955
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
"Mark E. Burrill" asked:
> Can anyone comment on the legitimacy of the work of Dr. D.A. Waite?
I used to read a newsletter put out by Waite, back when I first got
into textual criticism while in college. The newsletter was called
"The Dean Burgon News" and it was published by what was essentially a
one-man organization called "The Dean Burgon Society." He would
write multi-part articles with headers such as "Part 1 of 27 parts,"
which was irritating enough; but then every line in the
newspaper-column format was punctuated with bold print, words in all
caps, underlining, and other various ways of shouting.
The articles always said the same thing over and over: I'm right and
everybody else is wrong. The King James was good enough for John the
Baptist so it's good enough for me and anybody who doesn't revere the
King James is going straight to hell. No evidence, no scholarship,
no examination of the materials, just ranting and raving about how
great the King James is and how evil Westcott and Hort were. Every
other word was emphasized in some way; it frequently reminded me of
the old story about the notes in the margin of the preacher's
outline: "Theology weak here--yell like crazy!"
Oh, yes, about the "Dr." part: something he doesn't advertise in his
writings or his interviews is that his doctorate has nothing to do
with textual criticism, Greek or anything else related to the
biblical materials; it's in speech.
Every time I received a "Dean Burgon News" I suspected that Burgon
was doing back-flips in his grave about the absurdities being
committed in his name.
Dave
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur/home.html
"If you love something, set it free. If it returns,
you haven't lost it. If it disappears and never comes back,
then it wasn't truly yours to begin with. And if it just
sits there watching television, unaware that it's been set
free, you probably already married it."
Back