Thu Apr 4 01:23:15 1996

From majordom  Thu Apr  4 01:23:15 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA20357; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 01:23:15 +0500
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 01:20:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Maurice Robinson 
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: autographs versus archetypes
In-Reply-To: 
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1082
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu



On Tue, 2 Apr 1996, Carlton L. Winbery wrote:

> I sense that we are drifting off into a discussion that caused a lot of
> flame throwing a few weeks back on the b-greek list.  (I threw my share.)
> May we get back to the Greek and Hebrew text that we can all have before us
> and leave these discussions to other lists.  Please.
> Carlton Winbery

I concur with Carlton, and I intend to avoid further discussion on the
inspiration/inerrancy/autographs theme, even though from differing
theological persepctives this will affect one's view of and approach to NT
textual criticism in varying degrees, as does all theological opinion. 
Discussion of various theological perspectives simply is NOT the substance
of NT text-critical views, regardless of the vehemence of the advocacy. 


_________________________________________________________________________
Maurice A. Robinson, Ph.D.           Assoc. Prof./Greek and New Testament
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary     Wake Forest, North Carolina
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Back