Fri Apr 5 22:23:40 1996

From majordom  Fri Apr  5 22:23:40 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA02106; Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:23:40 +0500
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 21:25:50 +0400
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net (Carlton L. Winbery)
Subject: Re: The long ending of Mark
Content-Length: 705
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

Jim West wrote;
>It seems to me that the long ending of Mark has been virtually abandoned by
>text critics.  Are there any today who still believe it to be authentic?  (I
>ask because I learned today that F.D.E. Schleiermacher accepted it as
>authentic!!!).
>
W.R. Farmer of SMU several years back published an article arguing for the
authenticity of Mark 16:9-20.  It's obviously conflate nature fits well
with the contention that all of Mark is a conflation of Matthew and Luke.
I still consider the ending to have been constructed in the second century
before the time of Tatian.

Carlton L. Winbery
Prof. Religion
LA College, Pineville, La
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net
winbery@andria.lacollege.edu

Back