Sat Apr 6 19:06:39 1996

From majordom  Sat Apr  6 19:06:39 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA05112; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 19:06:39 +0500
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:08:52 +0400
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net (Carlton L. Winbery)
Subject: Re: The long ending of Mark
Content-Length: 427
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

Don,
I might add that I later worked through Mann's commentary on Mark in the
Anchor Bible written from the perspective of the Greisback hypothesis.  His
difficulty in making sense of the text and laborous efforts to explain
Mark's method convinced me that his was a wasted interprize.
Grace,
Carlton
END

Carlton L. Winbery
Prof. Religion
LA College, Pineville, La
winberyc@popalex1.linknet.net
winbery@andria.lacollege.edu

Back