Sat Apr 6 20:35:51 1996

From majordom  Sat Apr  6 20:35:51 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA05503; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 20:35:51 +0500
Message-Id: <3166AD50.2BAE@ucr.campus.mci.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1996 17:43:44 +0000
From: Don Wilkins 
Organization: UC Riverside
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: The long ending of Mark
References: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1014
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

Carlton L. Winbery wrote:
> 
> Don,
> I might add that I later worked through Mann's commentary on Mark in the
> Anchor Bible written from the perspective of the Greisback hypothesis.  His
> difficulty in making sense of the text and laborous efforts to explain
> Mark's method convinced me that his was a wasted interprize.

Thanks, Carlton. I also want to apologize if my last message seemed 
a bit abrupt; it was only because I thought your "END" closing was 
meant to let me know that you did not want to discuss the matter 
further, and I see that I probably misconstrued.
I do a lot of research with computer programming, and one thing I 
would like to explore is stylometric computer analysis. I'm not sure 
that it would have value for the synoptic problem, but it has been 
used a good deal for evaluating authorship problems etc. in classical 
literature. 
Thanks again. It's a pleasure to follow your discussions and I will 
continue to do so, hopefully getting up to speed in the process.

Don Wilkins

Back