Sun Apr 7 00:26:14 1996

From majordom  Sun Apr  7 00:26:14 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA06164; Sun, 7 Apr 1996 00:26:14 +0500
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 1996 00:23:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Maurice Robinson 
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: The long ending of Mark
In-Reply-To: <316692E4.13B4@ucr.campus.mci.net>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 862
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu



On Sat, 6 Apr 1996, Don Wilkins wrote to Carlton Winbery:

> Carlton, I am very weary of the so-called "assured result" of Marcan 
> priority, so it's refreshing to see such a remark as this. Two 
> questions: do you agree with this conflation theory (I infer that you 
> do), and are there many other textual critics that would agree with 
> it? My guess would be no, but I would love to hear otherwise.

Like the early fathers, I happen to hold to Matthean priority, but this 
does not mean that I consider Mark a mere conflation or abridgment of Matt 
and Lk. 
_________________________________________________________________________
Maurice A. Robinson, Ph.D.           Assoc. Prof./Greek and New Testament
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary     Wake Forest, North Carolina
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Back