Mon Apr 8 10:53:27 1996

From majordom  Mon Apr  8 10:53:27 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA10556; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 10:53:27 +0500
Message-Id: <9604081359.AA01366@osf1.gmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Synoptic source criticism
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 09:59:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Stephen C Carlson" 
In-Reply-To:  from "Richard K. Moore" at Apr 8, 96 08:05:46 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 600       
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu

Richard K. Moore wrote:
>Let us not forget, however, that by their own admission, one of the
>principles guiding the editors of the NA26/NA27 text in the decisions they
>took for the Gospels was a commitment to Marcan priority.

I'm curious to know whether Markan priority affected the determination any
particular reading.  Does anyone have an example?

Stephen Carlson
-- 
Stephen C. Carlson, George Mason University School of Law, Patent Track, 4LE
scarlso1@osf1.gmu.edu              : Poetry speaks of aspirations, and songs
http://osf1.gmu.edu/~scarlso1/     : chant the words.  -- Shujing 2.35

Back