Sun May 5 18:30:22 1996

From majordom  Sun May  5 18:30:22 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA07155; Sun, 5 May 1996 18:30:22 +0500
Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 18:25:30 -0400
Message-Id: <199605052225.AA17250@vnet.net>
X-Sender: mburrill@popmail3.vnet.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: "Mark E. Burrill" 
Subject: Re: Acts 9:5
Content-Length: 417
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu


>Since D is defective here, it would seem that this is a "Western" reading.
>(Notice that, of the three Greek witnesses to include the reading, two --
>E and 629 -- are Greek-Latin diglots.)
>
>The reason for the insertion is not hard to find: The words are
>derived from the parallel in Acts 26:14.
>
>I hope this helps.
>

It sure does. I had not even considered the parallel. It makes much more
sense now.

Mark

Back