Tue Jun 11 21:42:40 1996
From owner-tc-list Tue Jun 11 21:42:40 1996
Return-Path:
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id VAA02921; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 21:41:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 21:38:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Maurice Robinson
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Holmes Overview Revisited
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 1549
On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, Robert B. Waltz wrote:
> I have to agree with Maurice on this. While I concede that scholars
> such as Zuntz and Metzger had textual theories (Metzger's being a
> slightly modernized version of Westcott & Hort) ....
Metzger chooses to retain the "Lucianic Recension" and "Byzantine
conflation" concept from Hort while abandoning virtually everything else
in Hort's transmissional theory except the deprecation of the Byzantine
Text. In the end, Metzger remains a variant-by-variant eclectic with no
integrated theory of transmission.
> >I still maintain, therefore, and unapologetically, that "modern eclecticism
> >still proceeds as if it has no theory of textual transmission ... "
> >I suggest you ask Epp and see whether he does not agree with me on this
> >point.
>
> I'm not sure that Epp would go that far -- but his recent collection of
> essays suggests that he is *still* frustrated at the lack of progress in
> this area.
I definitely would be interested in knowing precisely what Epp thinks on
this point. All I know is what he has written in numerous articles, and
the thrust seems to be in the direction I stated (and he told me what
seemed like much the same over lunch in Cleveland some years ago).
_________________________________________________________________________
Maurice A. Robinson, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof./Greek and New Testament
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary Wake Forest, North Carolina
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back