Tue Aug 20 14:48:19 1996

From owner-tc-list  Tue Aug 20 14:48:19 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA19680; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:47:09 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date-warning: Date header was inserted by InfoAve.Net
From: Jim West 
Subject: Re: Manuscripts
X-Sender: jwest@mail.sunbelt.net
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Message-id: <1.5.4.16.19960820144031.2cbf4ce0@mail.sunbelt.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 451

At 01:19 PM 8/20/96 -0400, you wrote:

>
>I have heard this question asked a number of times, but I have never been
>sure why. Are the collations we have in the apparatus of UBS4 and NA27 not to
>be trusted? I have talked to people to imply this. Or is it that they are not
>complete enough?
>
>Bill Combs
>Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary
>

It is not that NA27 is untrustworthy.  It is that scholars like to do their
own work.

Yours,

Jim W

Back