Tue Oct 29 05:15:23 1996

From owner-tc-list  Tue Oct 29 05:15:23 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id FAA03467; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 05:13:39 -0500
From: "Professor L.W. Hurtado" 
Organization: Divinity Faculty
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 10:09:24 +000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Versional variants
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.33)
Message-ID: <2D373D1AF1@div.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 1297

Thanks to Jean Valentin for his list of variants which seem to be 
supported by two or more versional traditions.  As he notes, however, 
at least a number from his list could be considered coincidental 
"agreements", which scribes or translators independently producing 
the same/similar variation either deliberately or by accident.
We must, therefore, *weigh* the variants, as to whether they can more 
easily be accounted for as coincidental or may require some "genetic" 
connection to explain them.  Agreements in individual variants are not very 
meaningful *unless the variants are significant [i.e., suggest a 
historical/genetic connection] or are so plentiful as to suggest a 
common textual history*.
We must, thus, ask for a complete list of the places where these same 
versional traditions *agree and disagree*, and not merely an 
anecdotal list of variants such as Valentin provided us.  The history 
of textual criticism in this century has been plagued with such 
anecdotal lists, perhaps esp. in connection with the so-called 
"Caesarean" text-type, as I hope to have shown in my 1981 study of 
Codex W.
Larry Hurtado
L. W. Hurtado
University of Edinburgh,
New College
Mound Place 
Edinburgh, Scotland EH1 2LX
Phone: 0131-650-8920
Fax: 0131-650-6579
E-mail:  L.Hurtado@ed.ac.uk

Back