Thu Oct 31 08:43:37 1996

From owner-tc-list  Thu Oct 31 08:43:37 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id IAA28191; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 08:41:49 -0500
From: rachel@ms1.hinet.net
Message-Id: <199610311334.VAA00030@ms1.hinet.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 96 14:33:04
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: TC and conservatives
In-Reply-To: 
X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v1.14 (Unregistered)
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 1988

In , on 10/31/96 
   at 12:15 AM, "Mark Arvid Johnson"  said:


Well time once again for that lurker to come out of hiding
and let Maurice know that I am still here!!!!
Before this thread goes any further I think it would behoove
many people to take some advice from B-Greek
Some threads just go on and on and on.....
due to their nature.....
I am very happy and satisfied with the threads that are coming in and do
not wish to be involved or have to wade thru this stuff once again.....
I will continue to declare that I am a Maurice Robinson supporter for the
simple reason ---- that I have not found anything else that is more
reasonable than his opinion.....
With all due respect to the other heavyweights on this newsgroup.....
 Unfortunately I have neither the time or the material to 
keep up with the flow......
KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK GUYS AND GALS !!!!!



>>>I prefer not to be included in the same list with Hills, since he is a
>KJV-Only defender.

>How do you define KJV-Only? I have usually seen it refer to those that
>hold that the KJV is correct in all readings, infallible, and perhaps
>directly inspired as well. Edward F. Hills, though he did defend most
>minority readings in the TR and KJV, DID acknowledge textual errors in
>the KJV.  [ Believing Bible Study, pp.81-88, 214-228; The King James
>Version Defended, p. 229-30. ] 

>> I read a book by Gordon H Clarke called
>> "Logical criticisms of TC". 

>>>A terrible booklet in my opinion, which shows the author to fully
>misunderstand the subject about which he presumes to pontificate.

>Would you give an outline of your criticisms of this work? Superficially,
>at least, Gordon Clark's position and yours are similar; both are
>Byzantine Priority, specifically distanced from a KJVO or TR position.



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
rachel@ms1.hinet.net
-----------------------------------------------------------

Back