Tue Oct 22 20:10:59 1996

From owner-tc-list  Tue Oct 22 20:10:59 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id UAA08006; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 20:09:46 -0400
Message-Id: <326D5FCB.721D@dhinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 18:59:07 -0500
From: Hubert Arthur Bahr III 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (Win95; U)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Textual Criticism Theories
References: <199610221547.QAA31046@ermine.ox.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 532

I wonder how these theories can be restated to include the HB/LXX 
instead of just the NT.  What are the benefits to be derived from each 
theory? What are the shortcomings of each? how can we best overcome
those shortcomings?

I am also confused as to why those who prefer the Byzantine text type 
should be a seperate group from those who prefer a particular text type.

perhaps we could group scholars into 3 groups
	1. Textually uncritical. 
        2. Champions of a particular text type.
        3. Eclectics.
coments anyone?

Back