Wed Oct 23 03:14:32 1996

From owner-tc-list  Wed Oct 23 03:14:32 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id DAA10190; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 03:13:09 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 09:09:14 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Johannes van der Tak 
X-Sender: joannest@cclsun01
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Cc: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Textual Criticism Theories
In-Reply-To: <326D9C90.2E68@dhinternet.com>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 699

Yes, Hubert Bahr, that is a correct suggestion about versions. I have 
been working on the text of the Slavonic version, of which by the way up 
to now no critical or other edition exists, and I noticed that the 
Slavonic version may in some minor cases contribute something to the 
correct choice in establishing the Greek text. 
My publications on this have appeared in Paleobulgarica (1995) and Polata 
Knigopisnaya (1996). I showed, however, that it concerns only minor 
points, not "main issues" in belief or that sort of Christian topics.

Interesting. I follow most discussions attently.

Johannes van der Tak
University of Amsterdam, Slavic department
e-mail Johannes.van.der.Tak@let.uva.nl

Back