Fri Nov 1 10:16:29 1996

From owner-tc-list  Fri Nov  1 10:16:29 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA09459; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:15:16 -0500
Message-Id: <1.5.4.16.19961101151058.22f781a0@pop.mindspring.com>
X-Sender: scarlson@pop.mindspring.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 10:10:58 -0500
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: "Stephen C. Carlson" 
Subject: Re: More on 2427, family resemblances
Cc: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 912

At 03:36  10/31/96 -0700, Robert B. Waltz wrote:
>In fact, I once proposed to Ulrich Schmidt (based on the "folkloric"
>styles of some of the material in Matthew and Luke) that the two
>gospels had at least *six* sources -- Mark, Q1 (parallel to the
>Gospel of Thomas), Q2 (Q material not in Thomas), M1, L1, and L2.
>Some were written (Mark), some oral (Q1, L2), and some I'm not
>sure about.

First, a minor nit on terminology.  It seems to me that the notations
Q1 and Q2 are already used in synoptic source criticism to denote the
strata of Q according to Kloppenborg (there is also a Q3).  Both the
Q1 and Q2 layers have parallels to Thomas.

Second, what do you mean by L1 and L2?

Stephen Carlson
--
Stephen C. Carlson                   : Poetry speaks of aspirations,
scarlson@mindspring.com              : and songs chant the words.
http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/ :               -- Shujing 2.35

Back