Wed Nov 13 12:18:33 1996

From owner-tc-list  Wed Nov 13 12:18:33 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id MAA00127; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 12:17:12 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 12:13:15 -0500
Message-Id: <9611131713.AA18154@is.nyu.edu>
X-Sender: sqs2081@is4.nyu.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: Sari Slater 
Subject: Re: question
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 1053

At 11:21 AM 11/13/96 -0500, you wrote:
>With regard to Tim Ward's question concerning the biblical perspective on 
>sex and advertising, since this is clearly not a topic related to textual 
>criticism, please direct your responses (if any) to Tim directly (at 
>photog@pinn.net) rather than to the list.
>
>Jimmy Adair
>Manager of Information Technology Services, Scholars Press
>    and
>Managing Editor of TELA, the Scholars Press World Wide Web Site
>---------------> http://scholar.cc.emory.edu <-----------------
>
>
>
Jimmy -

        I'm not 100% sure that I agree it's not related to textual
criticism.  By it I mean "sex" in the bible.  Advertising, clearly not
textual criticism related.  But sex?  Yes.

        I posted only because one of the immediate responses to the Ward
question read ill-informed and prejudiced to me.  In addition, the religious
content contained in both of the posts is totally inappropriate to a
scholarly list.  IMHO.

        If my post upset you, please let me know.  

        Thanks,

        Sari

        

Back