Wed Nov 13 13:27:37 1996

From owner-tc-list  Wed Nov 13 13:27:37 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA01101; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:26:05 -0500
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 11:20:55 -0700
From: Lyle Eslinger 
Subject: Re: Question on God and Sex
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
In-Reply-To: <199611131727.JAA22405@m2.sprynet.com>
Message-Id: 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 719


On Wed, 13 Nov 1996 09:27:56 -0800 ptl@sprynet.com wrote:

>If the deity has a plan for sex, it is not terribly well
>>fleshed-out.  Given his own solitary bachelorhood,
>widowhood or state of
>>permanent divorce, it is not surprising.
>>
>>- Sari Slater
>>
>
>Do I pick up a little bit of "bias" in these statements?!?
>Perhaps a little bit of "eisegesis?"
>
>
>
>***********************************************************
>Paul Lorenzen -- Sparks, Nevada  -- Email - ptl@sprynet.com
>http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/ptl/lorenzen.htm
>
>Only one life, 'twill soon be past;
>only what's done for Christ will last!
                   ^
                  /|\
                   |


No bias in your call sign, eh Paul?

Back