Wed Nov 13 13:39:26 1996

From owner-tc-list  Wed Nov 13 13:39:26 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA01201; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:38:00 -0500
Message-ID: <328A1677.5934@accesscomm.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 12:41:59 -0600
From: Jack Kilmon 
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Subject: Re: Question on God and Sex
References: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 567

Lyle Eslinger wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 13 Nov 1996 09:27:56 -0800 ptl@sprynet.com wrote:
> 
> >If the deity has a plan for sex, it is not terribly well
> >>fleshed-out.  Given his own solitary bachelorhood,
> >widowhood or state of
> >>permanent divorce, it is not surprising.
> >>
> >>- Sari Slater
> >>
> >
> >Do I pick up a little bit of "bias" in these statements?!?
> >Perhaps a little bit of "eisegesis?"


	If the Creator didn't think sex was a grand idea, we would
reproduce by transverse fusion.

Off topic...but brings a smile.

Jack Kilmon
jpman@accesscomm.net

Back