Wed Jan 15 13:47:50 1997

From owner-tc-list  Wed Jan 15 13:47:50 1997
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA19421; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 13:46:17 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 18:30:32 GMT
Message-Id: <1.5.4.16.19970115183926.64b723ae@pop-3.ukonline.co.uk>
X-Sender: de.anderson@pop-3.ukonline.co.uk (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: The Andersons 
Subject: Original Text
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 809

Greetings from London.

I am one of the 'lurkers' on the tc-list.  Currently I am in an MPhil/PhD
programme, working on a comparison of the methodologies and philosophies
employed in Old Testament and New Testament textual criticism.  One of the
biggest difficulties in this has been trying to pin down how different
scholars define the term 'original text'.  If I may be so bold, I would be
interested in getting your personal thoughts on what the 'original text' is
(or 'texts' are).  Individual comments will not be included in my thesis; I
am primarily interested in a general consensus of thought.  If you don't
want to clutter up the list, please feel free to send any responses to my
personal e-mail.

I would appreciate any comments which you might have opportunity to provide.
Thanks!

Deb Anderson

Back