Mon Jan 20 19:48:33 1997

From owner-tc-list  Mon Jan 20 19:48:33 1997
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id TAA11152; Mon, 20 Jan 1997 19:46:33 -0500
X-Sender: waltzmn@popmail.skypoint.com
Message-Id: 
In-Reply-To: <32E3E794.14E5@accesscomm.net>
References: <1.5.4.16.19970116150701.0c473ef8@mail.sunbelt.net>		
 	
 
 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 18:44:57 -0700
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: "Robert B. Waltz" 
Subject: Apologies (Was: Re: Original Text)
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 672

To save wear and tear on your monitors, I won't quote much of Jack
Kilmon's letter. I thought he was pounding a point home by repetition.
I see that he was just seeking clarity. My apologies for my
misinterpretation.

If there are any other questions about what I said, I will try to
answer politely.

Sorry about all that.



-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

                            Robert B. Waltz
                         waltzmn@skypoint.com

Want more loudmouthed opinions about textual criticism?
Try my web page: http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn
(A very rough draft of part of the Encyclopedia of NT Textual Criticism)

Back