Thu Jan 30 11:09:48 1997

From owner-tc-list  Thu Jan 30 11:09:48 1997
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id LAA12158; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:09:17 -0500
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 11:04:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Nichael Cramer 
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
cc: hurd@chass.utoronto.ca
Subject: Re: 7Q5
In-Reply-To: <199701301419.JAA16360@chass.utoronto.ca>
Message-ID: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 608

John C. Hurd wrote:
> I am not sure that I have seen all the 7Q5 postings, but so far I have not
> seen any suggestion that one should scan the LXX for a match for the
> agreed characters.  That would seem to me the obvious place to look for a
> match (or matches?).  If it seems useful, I'll give it a try.  What range
> of characters would you-all suggest for the MS line length?  --  John

I'm pretty sure this has already been done, not only in the LXX but also
on a much broader scale; e.g. across the full TLG database.  (Again, see
the dicussion in the Stanton book and article mentioned earlier.)

N

Back