Sun Jan 5 13:34:00 1997

From owner-tc-list  Sun Jan  5 13:34:00 1997
Return-Path: 
Received: by scholar.cc.emory.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA17819; Sun, 5 Jan 1997 13:31:49 -0500
X-Sender: waltzmn@popmail.skypoint.com
Message-Id: 
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 1997 11:27:47 -0700
To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
From: "Robert B. Waltz" 
Subject: Re: Byzantine editions (Was: Re: James)
Sender: owner-tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tc-list@scholar.cc.emory.edu
content-length: 814

On Sat, 4 Jan 1997, "Ronald L. Minton"  wrote:

>Just for clarification, I thought Berry only did the dictionary in the 
>back, and that Samuel Bagster did the actual interlinear.  If this is 
>true, we should not call it the Berry interlinear.  Can someone verify this?

The cover of my copy states that Berry did the dictionary. It does
not even credit the interlinear (as best I can tell).

I believe the collation of the various editions was done by Scrivener;
at least, I've seen that comparison, without the interlinear, published
under his name.

-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-

                  Robert B. Waltz
               waltzmn@skypoint.com

Want more loudmouthed opinions about textual criticism?
Try my web page: http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmn

Back