Subject: Re: Ro 1:16

From: Jim West <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 12:57:02 -0400 (EDT)

At 06:10 PM 10/1/97 +0100, you wrote:

>1. G (012) and the facing Old Latin column g also omit PRWTON in Rm 1:16.
>Therefore, it is entirely possible that Marcion already found the omission
>in the text he used.

Thanks for this info.

>
>2. By consequence, the alternative in your question is too narrow.
>

Yes, I see that.

>3. To put the issue my way: B and Marcion do not agree significantly when
>it comes to rarely attested readings.
>
Again, thanks.

>
>Ulrich Schmid,
>Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies

Jim
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West

Adjunct Professor of Bible,
Quartz Hill School of Theology

[email-masked]