Subject: Re: tc-list The LXX

From: "Kevin W. Woodruff" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 16:42:32 -0400

Matt:

That theory arose because certain people are unwilling to concede that the
NT writers cited a "corrupt" version as authorative scripture. There is
actually no supporting evidence in the way of hard facts to support that the
LXX is a post New Testament creation. 

At 01:21 PM 4/26/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi all
>
>If this is not a matter of TC then please just ignore it or respond to me
>privately. I have been reading some material on the net bringing into
>question the existence of a BC LXX and the accepted view that the NT
>writers quote from it rather than the Masoretic. How conclusive can we be
>that a BC LXX was done, completed and used by the NT writers.
>
>Thanks
>Matt Bell
>
>

 Kevin W. Woodruff, M.Div.
Library Director/Reference Librarian
Cierpke Memorial Library
Tennessee Temple University/Temple Baptist Seminary
1815 Union Ave. 
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404
United States of America
423/493-4252 (office)
423/698-9447 (home)
423/493-4497 (FAX)
[email-masked] (preferred)
[email-masked] (alternate)
http://funnelweb.utcc.utk.edu/~kwoodruf/woodruff.htm